Fourth Grader suspended for failing to answer test question

Jim | Washington | Monday, May 16th, 2005

Fourth Grader Suspended For Not Answering A WASL Question

Updated 16 May 2005: Suspension letter and legal requirements for administering WASL added.
Updated 16 May 2005: Full text of suspension letter added. Details at bottom of post.

Nine year-old Tyler Stoken, a student in the Aberdeen Public School District, didn’t know how to answer an essay question on the Washington Assessment of Student Learning test. As punishment for leaving the question blank his principal suspended him for five days.

Tyler paraphrases the question saying, “You look out one day at school and see your principal flying by a window. In several paragraphs write what happens next.” He’s asked, “So why didn’t you answer that question?” He says, “I couldn’t think of what to write the essay without making fun of the principal.”

He refused to answer the question even after his mother was called to the school. Tyler’s mother Amy Wolfe says, “And he said he didn’t know the answer. He just didn’t know what to write. And they were telling me to make him answer the question.”

He still didn’t, so Tyler was given a 5-day suspension. In the letter that went home to mother, the principal writes, “The fact that Tyler chose to simply refuse to work on the WASL after many reasonable requests is none other than blatant defiance and insubordination.”


Shortly after receiving the suspension letter they received a phone call from Superintendent Marty Kay apologizing for the suspension.

“Because I think a mistake was made and over reacting to Tyler’s refusal to complete the test,” said Aberdeen school superintendent Marty Kay.

The superintendent wants Tyler immediately re-instated at school. But Tyler’s mother says the damage has been done. Mom tells son, “Well, nobody will scream at you again. I promise you that.”

Tyler doesn’t want to go to that school any more and you can’t blame him. He was manipulated and then punished because he couldn’t answer a test question.

WASL opponents also believe the principal and teachers broke the law by interfering with the WASL test.

It had better have been a violation of the testing rules. If a teacher and principal browbeating a test taker into answering a question in any particular manner is not against the rules then the test is worse than useless.

(Tip credit to Mike Sabo)


UPDATE 16 May 2005

Suspension Letter
Test administration instructions

This excerpt from the suspension letter shows a striking lack of familiarity with basic mathematics:

As he chose NOT to perform, he will get a zero on that section, which will be averaged with the scores of all of the other students in his class: in this case, 10 other children. Obviously, a 0, when averaged with only 10 other scores, can drastically impact the average. Thus, he has compromised the representation of what his peers know and are able to do. Their scores will be reported as a group, not as individuals. Additionally, this extends to the whole fourth grade, as our school score, the one that is reported to the state and the media, is an average of all fourth grade students. Thus, his choice impacts Tyler, his classmates, his grade mates, and his school. As we have worked so hard this year to improve our writing skills, this is a particularly egregious wound.

Principal MCarthy is trying to make a case for the severity of Tyler’s actions but instead shows in graduated steps how little his failure to answer the question actually affects anything. She states that his grade is averaged into those of his class so his zero is mitigated by the nine other students in his class. But wait, it’s actually averaged into the entire fourth grade student body. That makes its actual impact exceptionally small.

She also has a problem with the basic principles of grading. His failure to answer the question will get him a zero for that question but she represents this as if he will receive a zero for the entire test: “Obviously, a 0, when averaged with only 10 other scores, can drastically impact the average.”

It is also very clear that Principle MCarthy violated the rules on administering this test.

You may not point out to students an incorrectly answered question, point out questions that have not been completed, or read and comment on student essays.

RCW 28A.635.040 and WAC 180-87-060 both provide penalties for the unauthorized use or disclosure of test content and flagrant disregard of generally recognized professional standards in test preparation and administration. Unprofessional conduct must be reported to the Office of Professional Practices at OSPI.

As the test is administered by legal fiat this gross abuse may also constitute breaking the law.

(Tip credit to Bob for finding the links to these two resources.)


UPDATE2 16 May 2005

The site with the suspension letter is offline so I am reproducing the letter here.

Central Park School
601 School Road
Aberdeen, WA 98520

May 6, 2005

Dear Ms. Wolfe:

After much thought and after carefully weighing several factors, I have reached the following decision: Tyler is suspended from attendance at Central park school for a period of five (5) days beginning Monday, May 9, 2005 through Friday, May 13, 2005. This decision has been reached for the following reasons: Tyler refused, on six separate occasions, to comply with a reasonable request made by his teachers, myself, and even you, his parent. In schools, when a teacher or other staff member gives a direction or a request to perform, a student is expected to do so. In other instances where students have simply refused, consequences have been imposed. The fact that Tyler chose to simply refuse to work on the WASL after many reasonable requests is none other than blatant defiance and insubordination. Therefore, a reasonable consequence is a short-term suspension.

Unfortunately, the consequences of Tyler’s decision do not end with this disciplinary action. Not only will his achievement be misrepresented on the highest stakes measure of academic performance he has met to date, but the scores of his classmates will also be invalid. As he chose NOT to perform, he will get a zero on that section, which will be averaged with the scores of all of the other students in his class: in this case, 10 other children. Obviously, a 0, when averaged with only 10 other scores, can drastically impact the average. Thus, he has compromised the representation of what his peers know and are able to do. Their scores will be reported as a group, not as individuals. Additionally, this extends to the whole fourth grade, as our school score, the one that is reported to the state and the media, is an average of all fourth grade students. Thus, his choice impacts Tyler, his classmates, his grade mates, and his school. As we have worked so hard this year to improve our writing skills, this is a particularly egregious wound.

You have the right to an informal conference with me concerning this suspension, pursuant to WAC 180-40-280. If you have questions, feel free to contact me at XXX-XXXX.

Sincerely,

Olivia McCarthy, Principal

CC: Marty Kay, Superintendent
Tita Mallory, Director of Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Barb Jones, Fourth Grade teacher Shawn Sanford, Fourth Grade teacher

27 Comments

Leave a comment

RSS feed for comments on this post.