Twelve year old suspended, facing expulsion, for arguing with accused sexual harasser
Teacher accused of more harassment
Updated 31 March 2005: Megan Camacho expelled, complaints of harassment discarded.
Updated 18 April 2005: Warren retires after being cleared by school. Details at bottom of post.
Seventh-grader Megan Camacho, a student at Ethel Kucera Middle School in the Rialto School District, got into an oral argument with her teacher George Warren. She was suspended and now faces an expulsion. Megan was fed up by a pattern of sexual harassment by Warren and lost her temper.
Since Megan’s accusation, other girls have come forward as well.
Megan said Warren also stared at girls’ chests and bare legs. Warren is on paid administrative leave while the Rialto Unified School District investigates the claims.
…
Lydia Garcia said Warren would whistle and howl at her 12-year-old daughter.
…
Carlos Yvonne Malone said her daughter was sexually harassed by Warren two years ago as an eighth-grade student at Kucera.
Malone said her daughter, now 15, complained about Warren’s behavior. Malone said Warren would rub her daughter’s shoulders and back, making the girl uncomfortable.Malone said she spoke to Warren about his behavior and he stopped touching her daughter but continued his behavior with other girls in her class.
Accusing a teacher of sexual harassment is a very serious thing. A false allegation can completely destroy somebody’s career. The allegation immediately following an argument and scholastic punishment could be a spurious, revenge motivated action. However, with two other corroborating and unsolicited allegations being made there is simply no excuse for not taking them seriously. Instead, the school board is continuing its punishment program against Megan for her outburst at a teacher.
On Friday, Megan’s parents learned that district officials plan to expel the girl. The Rialto school board is scheduled to vote on the recommendation at Wednesday’s meeting.
…
Floyd Braggs, the district’s director of administrative services, said he could not comment on the sexual-harassment accusation against Warren. He did say that the recommendation to expel Megan was based on evidence provided.“The panel listened to both sides equally and the student was given due process,’ Braggs said.
A panel of district administrators recommended expulsion, he said.
Why are they expelling Megan when they have not even determined if Warren is harassing his female students? Because it doesn’t matter. Even if it is conclusively shown that he was actively sexually harassing Megan her outburst was against the rules and there is no place for compassion, reason or mitigating circumstances under scholastic zero tolerance.
Contact Information:
Rialto School Board email addresses.
Ethel Kucera Principal Dave Price
UPDATE 31 March 2005
Decision to expel girl upsets mother
Megan Camacho has been expelled from her school and her harassment claim against Warren has been dismissed as having no merit.
Megan plans to attend another district school. She will be closely monitored. Megan can be removed from the district at any time if she behaves poorly. The expulsion will remain on her student record.
…
Syeda Jafri, a spokeswoman for the school district, said she could not comment on the accusations against Warren.Jafri did say Warren remains on paid administrative leave because the district investigation has not been completed.
So the end result is a 12 year-old girl expelled for a single verbal argument with a teacher. Frightful.
UPDATE 18 April 2005
Teacher cleared of harassment retires
“We’re happy he retired,” said Lilian Camacho, [Megan’s] sister. “I wish he would have been found guilty, but we’re happy with him not teaching.”
The board approved Warren’s resignation Wednesday.
“We accepted Mr. Warren’s resignation for the purposes of retirement,” district spokeswoman Syeda Jafri said. “He will not be coming back.”
Bill Hedrick, president of the Rialto teachers union, made it clear that Warren had been cleared by the school board, had simply retired of his own choice and that the sexual harassment allegations had nothing to do with his decision.
And if you believe that I’ve got a lovely bridge in New York that I’d like to sell you.
(Tip credit to Tori in Texas)
When did school administrators lose their common sense?
Obviously the words Rialto and reality are from very different roots.
Standing up for herself against a pedophile is grounds for suspension? Are lawyers standing in line to get this case?
She obviously has no father at home.
This human defect wouldn’t be able to do it again if I heard it was happening to one of my children.
This almost sounds like witnss tamering by intimidatig the witness. The School board should have their Due Process in Federal and State Courts.
“The panel listened to both sides equally and the student was given due process,’ Braggs said
Since when was a panel empowered with ‘due process’ authority and handing out sentences? If there was a crime the police should be involved and some real sentencing be involved.
I am almost speachless, My only comforting thought is if the school goes threw with this it would be a banner case in court to end Zero Tolerance, what with all the alegations already going on against teachers accross the the country for sexual abuse against students.
Something like this kind of happened to me in third grade but it was about physical and verbal abuse. I told on my third grade teacher who smacked a boy in front of the class and verbally abused the whole class almost every day. Well she threatened me saying if I told again she would have me locked up in juvenile hall for lying so I shut up. This happened in the mid 1980’s. These days I probably would have gone to juvie at nine years old for squealing on the teacher’s treatment of us kids.
Don’t federal and state sexual harassment laws include stiff penalties for organizations/institutions that retaliate against filers of good faith complaints?
This seems like a good application for those clauses.
I think the statement, “there is no place for compassion, reason or mitigating circumstances under scholastic zero tolerance” is very telling.
Has this girl’s mother gone to the police and made out a complaint?
The police need to be contacted. The mother also needs to go to the community. Plaster this guys picture with a caption of “Dont let this man near your children.” The more publicity she raises, the faster the school district will turn tail and run for cover. They also need to contact a lawyer and sue the district.
The mom and daughter need to sue everyone involved in getting her suspended. Students should be encouraged to stand up for their rights, not punished.
So basically the moral of the story is:
If I was a girl and a teacher was leering at me, I should just bend over ’cause if I excerise my rights and protections under the laws of both the US and all school districts, I could be expelled and my future crippled.
I am pleased to read so many comments regarding this case. I am Megan’s brother-in-law, and our family is doing all that we can to get due process for this teacher. The news reports do not give a clear picture of Megan as a student, her academic’s are the top of her class, she is involved in honor’s programs, and she has recieved several awards in her academic career. We as a family agree that the outburst was the improper way of confronting this individual, although Mr. Warren provoke Megan by stating “Your a kid who’s going to believe you over me”. This type of intimidation tactics can cause a child to be fearful. Megan was frightened to mention this to any of us due to the comments made by Mr. Warrren.
The most upsetting result from this is that other teachers, make comments that continue the line of fear for reporting problems with teachers, and students. A comment was made today by a co-worker of Mr. Warren’s stating that “Sometimes parents will cover up for their children. They will turn the tables around in order to avoid their children being expelled,”; What a farce, Megan was expelled because of her truthful account of these circumstances.
To the dismay of us all, Megan was expelled because the school board reported that she was a threat, in fact, they wanted her arrested under the Homeland Security Terrorist Act. The school board stated that Mr. Warren was fearful of his life, due to the outburst. The ironic part of this whole situation is that Mr. Warren stated, ” I never mentioned I was in fear of my life…Megan did not make comments in that frame of reference…”
We have contacted attorney’s and it has been difficult to obtain one; we are being told that because Megan was not physically touched theres no case….
That’s the glory of our system, we reward those who are quilty, until a siuation occurs that is hard to ignore.
Please join us and petition the school board for fair and equal treatment, please help us continue this fight.
Thank you for your support,
Jason Espinoza
There needs to be a federal lawsuit under Title IX. The school needs to also be charged under whistleblower laws.
Warren has nothing to fear from this girl, but I wouldn’t say the same regarding the fathers of the district. One wonders if there’s been a run on heavy rope at the local hardware store.
Mr. Espinosa:
Contact www.rutherford.org (The Rutherford Institute). It’s a law firm that does “zero tolerance” cases.
Assinate the teacher.
I’m sure it would be easy to find someone to elimiate the teacher.
Rest assured that if this were my daughter, Mr. Warren would have mighty good reason to fear for his life — or at least for what passes for his manhood.
This pedophile is a disgrace to the profession — and I urge making contact with appropriate state level officials, up to and including the governor.
Accusing a teacher of sexual harassment is a very serious thing. A false allegation can completely destroy somebody’s career. WHAT THE HELL ABOUT THE STUDENTS FUTURE….My only hope (as well as that of this country)is that these students who are VICTIMS of ZT will grow up to be teachers and /or administrators,and will remember their NIGHTMARE and vow to end this INSANITY…God bless our children.
Where are the ACLU and NOW? Afraid of upsetting the teachers union?
I’m sure the last thing victims of zero tolerance will want to be is public school teachers and administrators. In fact, I’m willing to bet that many of these victims will refuse to send their children to public school, just as many parents in my generation who attended Catholic schools refuse to send their children to them because of the abuse they suffered.
We don’t need the public schools anyway. There are plenty of options today.
I see some of you are comming around to my hanging Idea. good…Good.
This teacher should be affraid When he gets back to class the next girl he harasses may have parents that are not so Kind. (No jab at the parents they showed proper restraint, But the next family may not.) I wouldnt.
Bettina, you’ve made this comment, almost verbatim, in the past. We get it, you have issues with Catholoism, but that’s not the subject here.
It has nothing to do with Catholicism and everything to do with how the priests and nuns ran their schools, which was pretty abysmal.
Today’s public schools are pretty abysmal also.
I’m in a predominately Catholic area which plays a large role in School politics.
The article below, is very interesting and discusses some of the history behind moving security from the jurisdiction of NYC schools to the police department. Although in this article Mario Cuomo defends public education, he also expressed concerns that public school was anti-God and also felt that expanding privatized prisons satisfied the governments obligation to social reform through the penal system.
However you may feel about Catholic School, it is a legitimate issue and a frequent discussion to parents from public school teachers around here. Teachers imply this is pushing the responsibility of special education and discipline into Catholic Schools which penalizes parents who must literally pay for their parental sins. The public school obligation is to pay for transporation. The result is the private schools are very polarized in academic scores.
Parents are usually grateful for the existance of the schools, but it enforces the top-down management of education. Educators are determining a child’s problems in school are a moral failure of the parents. Parents are the object of public scrutiny, drugs and disinformation, pitting the individual against society; it means a person’s religous beliefs will certainly play a roll in a child’s economic opportunity.
http://www.nytimes.com/books/first/r/ravitch-century.html
In 1992 the state commissioner of education convened a blue-ribbon panel, chaired by former governor Hugh Carey, to examine Catholic education in the state. The study demonstrates how these institutions, much like other parochial schools around the country, have managed to excel within inner-city communities while nearby public schools fail. There was a significant difference, for example, found in the percentage of elementary school students performing at the third-grade level in reading (60 percent in public schools vs. 77 percent in Catholic) and mathematics (81 percent vs. 90 percent) and a dramatic difference in the passing rate on Regents Competency Examinations for high school students in mathematics (57 percent public vs. 78 percent Catholic), science (63 percent vs. 89 percent), writing (62 percent vs. 81 percent), and reading (62 percent vs. 91 percent). Contrary to the common perception about selectivity in Catholic schools, Catholic school students in the city were as likely as their public school counterparts to exhibit multiple risk factors that are associated with poor performance (for example, family income below $15,000, single-parent household, parents who did not complete high school).
Bettina, SWP’s post makes it pretty clear they’re running their schools just fine. Time for you to leave your personal axe grinding at home, where it belongs. Your personal issues with a PRIVATE school system are not relevant here, since private schools are free to operate as they see fit, and their customers have the choice of not patronizing them in an at will transaction. They’re simply not relevant to the issue of STATE RUN, PUBLIC schools overstepping the reasonable bounds we’ve placed on government power in this country. Whatever your bad experience with Catholic schools was, it’s not relevant.
For the last time (Oh, please God!), what I am saying is that public schools will suffer the same fate as Catholic schools are suffering now because victims of zero tolerance will not want their children to go through the same grief they did. That’s all. It’s really that simple. I’m sorry you can’t manage to get that, because it’s pretty straightforward. There’s nothing else to read into that statement — certainly nothing about me having an axe to grind with the Catholic church, which is pretty funny, since I’m a practicing Catholic. I just don’t know where you dig up your assumptions and assume that “WE know you have an axe to grind” You and who else?
You don’t know me personally, and I don’t know you personally. I don’t make assumptions about you — don’t make them about me. Okay?
I’m a proponent of today’s Catholic schools by the way. I wasn’t years ago. They are not run the same way today as the one’s in the 50’s and 60’s were, and I know that for a fact because I know people who teach in them (my sister-in-law, for one). I wish more parents would give them a chance, but many won’t, unfortunately, because of their experiences.
I’m also sure most Catholic school administrators don’t rely on gutless zero-tolerance policies either. They’re too intelligent for that.
Just drop it, will you?
Actually, my point the discussion of religon in education is an important one..
I am glad Bettina brough up the discussion because in my mind we are struggling with the collective authority of social services, law enforcement and education who are operating based on rumor and flakey numbers. I think drawing in religon as another source of social authority to control the public is the intention. In our area the administor targeted children who did not attend recreation at the Catholic Community Center on Wenesday (they were the good kids). I don’t know if his intention was to fuel a religous flame or he was simply Catholic, but he make his position clear.
Those statistics were taken quite a while ago before special ed soared and zt reigned. Right now many of the Catholic schools are going bankrupt and are running at below capacity. A few reason are their teachers are unionized, so they aren’t really different than the teachers in public schools and are demanding higher pay. They also suffer the rap of being special ed. I do believe they are committed and take kids the schools throw out. My husband is Jewish, and the idea offended him, so it didn’t help me much.
Bettina, your characterization just isn’t accurate. Most current Catholic school students have parents who attended Catholic schools. Any generational attrition is MUCH more attributable to current parents abandoning the church itself, usually over moral teachings that don’t fit within popular modern sensibilities, or because they wanted to remarry after a frivolous divorce, and both types of departures are more common among people who attended public schools and mediocre PSR or catechism classes.
In several threads, you’ve used the most tenuous of connections to work in your flimsy analogy between modern ZT and the Catholic schools of a generation ago, and it just doesn’t apply. I wouldn’t have brought this up if I didn’t get tired of seeing it. I’ll be glad to drop it if you will, but that means not trying to work your subtle dig on Catholic schools into every thread.
Okay, I’m just relating the experiences of several of my friends and relatives who attended Catholic schools in their youth. That’s all I’m going on — their experiences. I’m sorry that doesn’t count for much as far as you’re concerned, but I really don’t care what you think about the matter any longer.
I am somewhat confused on how this issue has become more about Catholic schooling. Nonetheless, I am thankful to all of you who addressed the subject I discussed previously. We have taken your advice and we have been successful in attaining several individuals to further our challenge. Please always post your concerns, my family and I check this site regularly for addtional info. I thank you again and I will keep you all updated.
Jason Espinoza
I’m glad you got a lawyer and the best of luck while you puruse justice.
This site really has nothing to do with Catholic education even if some people would like to think it does. I just made mention of the fact that public schools might go the way of Catholic schools because of the way they discipline their students.
And I pointed out that her comparison is irrelevant and depends upon false assumptions.
What’s the issue here with Special Education? It keeps coming up in passing. My wife is a special educator in Nevada, so I’ve got a pretty good idea of how it works, when it works as it should.
Often it doesn’t, but when it doesn’t, the process is strongly biased in favor of the child, and it pretty much precludes Zero Tolerence reactions.
The beautiful thing about Special Ed in practice is this: it mandates that each student be treated as an individual, with an Individual Education Plan. Essentially, by getting an IEP for your child at a school with a good SPED program, you get the benifits of a private education, at public expense.
If you respond to this, could you cc me in email at webmaster at graphictruth dot com?
“The beautiful thing …you get the benifits of a private education, at public expense.”
As a taxpayer, I don’t necessirly see the beauty in that.
Bob - Generally speaking the biggest problem with special education is when it is actually alternative education. Alternative schools have a reputation of being notorious pits where the “bad kids” get sent.
Jim Peacock,
Great coverage on the issue.
Who are you and what is your background?
This is my first time in the “blog” process and would like to respond.
Please contact me.
Boyer
Bob, My son became a zero tolerance target when he was declassified following his transition year in 7th grade. His teachers discouraged us from putting him in study skills classes or allowing special ed to interfere with the more challenging work he was doing. He did not have good small motor skills, his handwriting was not good, but typed 35 wpm in 4th grade. Although, even his teachers in elementary school told me the only help he ever personally received was extended time and arranged seatting, that was not reflected on his record. Instead it appeared he needed an aide (who never worked with him). The administration developed a huge folder of false testimonies in 7th grade as a resolution to childhood scabbles as soon as his transition year completed. The little papers like an IDEA meant nothing.
The very violent transition into alternative education began when the special ed teacher in an inclusion class claimed he ’smiled’ when the special ed kids got in trouble. The fact these same kids complained that they hated my son because he was not good at football had easily been resolved the prior year. This teacher took my son in the hall and told him “You have a come and get me smile and deserve to get beat up.” She admitted that in front of the entire administration and the regular teacher in the same class claimed it was not true. After we complained the following day, these kids took him in the hall and held his arms back while they hit him in the stomach and he collaspe on the floor. The principal(s) repeated this same comment, called him an immoral liar and he was repeatedly beaten until he was removed from the school and placed in a home-school program. We were told he could no longer attend school unless we were able to obtain an assigned aide. It was a big step for a kid who had previously needed no help.
We called the police, we spoke to lawyers, we involved the best psychologist we could find. My son woke me up at night with pools of blood on his pillow from biting his lip (controlling that nervous smile). His orthodontist was afraid to put braces on his teeth. The special ed aides became the enemy, rushing around to accuse him of anything based on the comment of one of ‘their kids’. The only private school that would accept him within commuting distance was Catholic which offended us because the principal(s) had implied he was immoral and needed religon. Our other alternative was sending him to live with a school teacher in Utah who took in ‘those kinds of kids’ for 40K a year or having him placed in a mental hospital. He wanted to attend school, so I let him.
My son feels the principal(s) hated him because he was not Catholic; I think the Catholic schools around here take in special ed kids and the principal(s) were trying to reduce school crowding. I spoke with my son yesterday about his emotional decline because. He seems ok now and has actually taken an interest in comparative religon. We believe a number of behaviors developed as a result of repeated violent abuse and simply went away when the abuse stopped. I feel very torn about allowing him to attend school at all. He did have a chance to work with a teacher that he idolizes and I do consider that a rare experience. Mostly special ed prevented him from attending more advanced classes and consumed his time with teachers who lacked the academic skills to teach a regular class. At some abstract level I hope he has learned to respect human diversity.
I have friends who had more success with special ed. I know people do not see the abuse until it happens to their child. These children simply disappear from view and their fragil lives crumble, some die. Administrators may use the public, lawyers, unions, politians, police and employees to fan the flames of debate because they are a trusted authority. Schoolwide discipline allows an adminstrator to emotionally removed themselves from the experiences of an individual. Phillip Zimbardo who popularized the term ‘broken windows’ that was used to catapult an inter-national campaigns of world-wide intolerance also wrote “The Psychology of Evil”. Evil is just someone ‘doing their job.
http://www.aaronsw.com/weblog/001450
The problem is not special ed, it is finding victims to fund the system. Forcing individuals to bear the liability of securing funds creates labels and targets. People are enraged to have personal issues imposed on them they might otherwise tolerate. Administrators reap financial rewards and reduced liability by ‘getting the kids the help they need.’ It sounds compassionate but, the fact is it’s an excuse to close our ears to the very real danger these children are in.
Way to go unions. Another scumbag protected.
People, don’t be so quick to jump on this guy. One of my district’s best AP teachers was accused by a few girls on his basketball team of something similar to this because they wanted a different coach. The reason the teacher retired was because the other teacher was in on it, was a racial minority and thus the school system wouldn’t fire hime out of fear of a lawsuit.
This is one of those cases were you may end up being rather surprised about the truth. The biggest problem here is that no one knows the girl or the teacher. For all we know, the girl could have it in her to go after a teacher like this because she really couldn’t stand him. A lot of “sexual harrassment” is just rubbish and character assassination. I’m not saying it didn’t happen this way, I’m just saying that in cases like this, it can be something very different from what it appears to be.
Mike, the allegations predate this girl’s tenure at the school. We also have the two year old case of the teacher changing his behavior in response to one complaint in the past, but only with that student. The allegations span a timeframe that doesn’t support the accusers being contemporaries.
Hi, my name is Jessica Camacho Espinoza, I am Megan Camacho’s older sister. Let me start of by thanking all of you for responding and giving my family and I so much advice. In cases like this everything helps. I was reading the recent updates and came across Mike F response. I am so sorry about your friend whom was mis-accused, I do agree that there are cases that may be a lie or as you said not as they appear.As you said you don’t know my sister nor the teacher but as posted there has been evidence.
My sister is only 12 years old, when things like this happen in your home your life changes. This whole “sexual harrassment case” has been occurring for some time now. There has been other girls that have came forward since my sisters case was revealed accussing Mr.Warren of the same thing. One of them was from 2 years ago, this to was brought to the attention of the school district. And as you can see nothing was done and now 2 years later this is still going on. It is a shame to know that this school district has closed there eyes and have allowed this to occur to innocent little girls.
In the result of all this my sister was suspended then expelled from her district and sent to another school. Now we find out that Mr.Warren has retired and my sister is still not allowed to return to her school.This case is still being investigated as told by the District. Here we are left waiting to see what will happen to this Mr.Warren in hope that this will not happen to other girls.Once again I thank all of you for taking your time to respond and for giving us your help and support.We are still pursuing our case and we just hope that justice will be served.
Jessica, we need to do more to protect our children against sexual predators and bring more attention to this problem. I am so sorry this has happened to your family.
In City Schools, Five Teachers Are Accused of Sex Offenses
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/21/nyregion/21teachers.html
Wow. Bettina, let me start by saying, I completely understand the point you were trying to make regarding the discipline that took place in “some” Catholic schools years ago and how that turned some parents off from sending their kids to Catholic school. I don’t think it is that hard of a concept to understand. My husband and I both attended 8 years of Catholic school. (different schools) His experience was horrible, mine was great. he talkes about being hit with a paddle and a stick, etc. When we had our first child and we began talking about schools, the first thing he said was, “I will not even consider sending him to Catholic school”. That was a result of the horrible memories that he experienced. I, on the other hand, had a very positive experience in 8 years of Catholic Grammar school so although I didn’t have a strong opinion one way or another, I respected my husband’s feelings and sent both our kids to Public School. I can tell you that both my husband and two kids are completely turned off with “zero tolerance” practices in our local Public school. Kids are being expelled at an alarming rate for a whole host of reasons. None have anything to do with bullying or violence. Mostly drug possession, and Tylenol and Advil and other prescription drug offenses. We have had 19 kids expelled in our school system (middle school has about 400 kids and high school has about 385 kids) for one calendar year in the last 14 months. My husband and I don’t beleive in expelling any kid for a first infraction (everyone should be entitled to one stupid teenage mistake) where is no violent or threatening behavior involved. What happend to a tier of consequences before you were completely thrown out of the school. My oldest is in college now, and my youngest has one year to go in high school. I wish I had another option for my son to do his senior year. I no longer beleive in our local public school system or any public school system that expels and shows “no Tolerance” and “no common sense” and would rather take away an education (one of the positives in the kid’s life) so freely. So your point of these kids now experiencing “zero tolerance” in any school system will turn them off of a particular school system is well taken. I don’t see what is so hard to understand. I think people are trying to read too much into the “Catholic” thing. Come on people. We are all shaped by our experiences, good and bad. I can tell you my son has more anger and maybe even feelings of hatred against our School Board and what it stands for. His best friend was one of their victims who has missed this entire year of school. (his junior year) He is a high achieving (all honors classes)student grade wise, he is an extremely talented athlete, he is a polite well rounded kid who admitted to smoking a little pot on a class trip. To me, we can do better then throw these kids out on the first offense. We can invest our time and compassion in these kids and try to stop the bad behavior instead of taking the stability out of their lives. Note: this kid was arrested for possession of pot a couple weeks ago. Whoops, I guess the expulsion did not stop him from the bad behavior. Can you beleive it??? Oh and another kid that they expelled for the same thing (he was on the same class trip), moved to Florida and began a new start in a new school. Guess what? The second week in his new school,he was arrested for possession of pot. Nope, the expulsion didn’t miraculously cure him either. Wake up people. Put your resources and energy into stopping zero tolerance in our schools and stop bickering amoung each other.
Our kids need us to stop school boards from throwing kids out of school. We are going to end up with an epidemic of uneducated kids going down all the wrong paths…..
To Whom It May Concern;
Whether Public, Private or Parochial School, all children need to be protected, whether from bullying, sexual, physical, or verbal abuses, no child, nor does anyone, deserve to be violated, belittled, nor have their dignity and self esteem destroyed. Regardless of the academic limits or intelligence of the child, no one has the right to ABUSE, BULLY OR VICTIMIZE. As educators, parents and all that are in contact with a child, adults should look to build self-esteem, instill strong character,protect and build trust. The parents in this case, from what I have read, did the correct thing, but the most important step they have taken, was to believe in, comfort and support their child. This will enhance communication and trust in the parents, and will keep the child closer to them. If the parent didn’t care, believe in their child, then this person may feel dirty, violated and victimized over again, which does lead to the run away, going with anyone that would comfort the child, leads to sexual exploitation.
Teachers aren’t trained to understand and listen to the child, which is unfortunate. Most times, you do hear as a teacher, you have the worst class, they are bad kids, etc. Did anyone ever take the time to be flexible, listen to the needs and concerns of the child. They may find that most rebellious students are acting out of anger due to trauma they’ve experienced. If we can reach the child in the younger grades, there would be one less gang member, follower, making wrong choices. Listening skills, patience, and understanding, no matter the class size, would lead to early intervention of conflict/resolution. Teachers need classes in awareness, psychology, and conflict/resolution, to train as mediators, and train peer mediators, as the youth tend to listen to other young people faster than an adult.
ZERO TOLERANCE to pedophilia, and all childhood abuses. No one has the right to abuse, violate or victimize another, ever!! No one should fear or protect the criminal, this would give them the permission to continue to violate another.
Wishing this young person a very happy and successful future. Good for the parents, support means alot to a child whom may be victimized.
K.G
False allegations agains anyone, especially in a sexual abuse case, is serious and can be criminally prosecuted. However, if you as a teacher, parent or anyone who does believe the safety and well being of the child is at risk, then to report this, no one will be prosecuted. It is your opinion or believe, not of malice to prosecute another for personal gain.
The school system obviously has enough allegations to accept the person’s resignation, or this person does know he’s an offender, and it would be a matter of time before the law has caught up to him. How many times did you hear of teachers sexually abusing a student? One too many in my book! Most school systems don’t have a code of conduct for all involved with the students, nor have they done an intensive background checks, and many do change identity and enter the system undetected. Some never have gotten caught, as they have never been convicted of these crimes. Sadly the child becomes the unsuspecting victim, as most pedophiles, or sexual perpetrators prey on the innocent, sheltered, quiet child, as out of fear the child wouldn’t say anything, and can be bullied into submission. Later on, you will see the change in the child’s behavior, academics, etc.
No matter the level of intelligence, needs, etc., no one deserves to have their dignity violated, or victimized in anyway.
Again, for this person to resign, not stay to fight agains allocations put forth against him, this alone does show guilt. I may be totally wrong in my assessment of this situation, and this teacher may have resigned not to continue the attention to the school for the best interest of the students or for his family, this to me doesn’t seem the reason.
No matter what…ZERO TOLERANCE should be practiced, whether student on student, parent on child,teacher on student, or anyone toward another. STOP THE ABUSES!!!! ZERO TOLERANCE!!!!