Zero tolerance only flows downhill

Jim | Florida | Friday, February 25th, 2005

Indian River school board won’t suspend teacher for slapping student

Katherine Cairns, an art teacher at Vero Beach High School in the School District of Indian River County, had an encounter with a willful student. The girl screamed at her when Cairns was trying to restore order in the bathroom and Cairns slapped the girl in the face. Schools Superintendent Tom Maher recommended a ten day unpaid suspension for striking a student. The School Board voted 3-2 to ignore the recommendation. Why?

Board member Kathryn Wilson said she was concerned about the students in Cairns’ class not being able to get work done because of the suspension. She said she wanted to see Cairns back in the classroom.


Cairns shouldn’t be punished because her absence harms the students? So a person is not responsible for their actions if punishing the person affects others. Interesting concept.

Board member Lenora Quimby said she did not support the suspension because she was interested in being fair and equitable. Last month, Quimby voted not to expel a student who hit a teacher when the teacher tried to break up a fight. Quimby said the student didn’t mean to hit the teacher, just as Cairns did not mean to hit the student.

Well, no. The teacher in that earlier incident was struck by an unintended blow. Cairns actively slapped a student. The first had no intent, the second had willful intent. They are not at all the same.

Dissenting voters were concerned about what this will say about the school system.

[Vice Chairman Craig] McGarvey said at the end of the meeting he was concerned about the board’s action. The board needs to send a message that violation of district rules will not be tolerated, he said.

Teachers and students need to understand there are consequences associated with their actions � whether intentional or accidental, he said.

So what would have happened if the situations were reversed? Vero Beach has a very strongly worded zero tolerance policy. From the Student Handbook:

ZERO TOLERANCE FOR SCHOOL RELATED VIOLENT CRIME

It is essential that schools be safe and orderly to provide environments that foster learning and high academic achievement. … The school district will invoke the most severe consequences provided for in the Code of Student Conduct in dealing with students who engage in violent criminal acts on school property…

Violent criminal acts include, but are not limited to the following offenses; … aggravated battery, battery or aggravated battery on a teacher or other school personnel…

Aggravated battery is when you plan to hit somebody and do so. Simple battery is what this teacher did. Simple battery on a student appears to be exempted by the policy though it is covered if it happens to a teacher.

So, did the Board do the right thing? I think so, but certainly not for the reasons they stated. I think they did the right thing because if my kid was the one screaming at a teacher in the bathroom and the teacher went off and slapped him I would shake the teacher’s hand, just before grounding my kid.

However, from a school discipline point of view as well as following the rules that they themselves have laid down the board has failed miserably.

14 Comments

Leave a comment

RSS feed for comments on this post.