Result of “thorough” suspension investigation is questioned

Jim | Maryland | Friday, December 17th, 2004

Board Hears Arguments in Student’s Appeal

River Hill High School student Phillip Ashtianie was accused last year of giving a bottle of Dasani filled with vodka to another student on a school bus. After a “thorough” investigation he was suspended for 45 days. Since it was at the end of the last school year the suspension was to continue through the beginning of this school year.

You may ask why I put “thorough” in quotes. I’m not normally one to use scare quotes but in this case they seem justified.

Throughout, Ashtianie maintained his innocence, a fact noted by the hearing examiner who found insufficient evidence to uphold the suspension.

[School system attorney Marc Blom] argued that the evidence was very strong that Ashtianie distributed alcohol, even though the student who became ill recanted his charge twice that Ashtianie gave him the bottle.

Blom also noted that this was the �most thorough� investigation conducted by Dr. Carl Cummings, who handles suspension hearings for the superintendent.

He said Ashtianie�s mother�s [exonerating] investigation lacked credibility because it wasn�t professional and wasn�t objective, a charge [Attorney Allen Dyer, who represents the Ashtianies] called slanderous.

�Look at what the moms do for the Howard County public school system and determine how credible and what kind of quality there is,� said Dyer.

In questions from school board members, Blom acknowledged that Cummings interviewed Ashtianie and the student who drank the alcohol as well as school administrators, but no one else. Cummings also reviewed statements gathered by school staff.

Cummings testified before the hearing examiner that it �Basically came down to who do I believe.�


So a “thorough” (there’s those scare quotes again) investigation includes only the students involved and several people who were not there. Of the people who were interviewed who had actual knowledge of the incident the defendant consistently maintained his innocence and the victim eventually admitted the same. Information gained from the moms interviewing the actual kids who witnessed the event was disregarded.

This was enough to suspend a student for 45 days.

Blom also stated that the suspension was actually helpful as it “softened his transition to high school”. Egad, talk about shedding the last shred of respectability you might have walked in with.

Attorney Dyer maintains that Howard County policy requires a thorough investigation by the principal and a second investigation by the Superintendent or his designee. �Neither was done in this case,� he said.

The Board of Education has taken the matter under advisement and will issue its its decision shortly.

Ashtianie is seeking an apology, reimbursement of legal fees and a clean record. He also wants the board to change the way appeals are handled for students suspended over 10 days. Ashtianie benefited from a stay on the suspension granted by School Superintendent Sydney Cousin. He would like to see that consideration given to other students who must wait for their appeals to be heard by the Board.

4 Comments

Leave a comment

RSS feed for comments on this post.